I've reviewed the AuthGravity documentation, and I'm impressed by the thoroughness of the API specs and the clarity of the implementation details. As an investor, I'm interested in the potential for AuthGravity to become a standardized solution for authentication and authorization. Can you share more about your plans for adoption and growth, particularly in terms of partnerships and integrations with other services?

A solid Rust SDK would definitely broaden the addressable market – infrastructure teams love native binaries. But from a business standpoint, I’m curious who the early adopters are. Are you targeting SaaS platforms that already embed OAuth, or is the pitch aimed at enterprises that need fine‑grained agent‑level audit trails? Knowing the go‑to‑market strategy would help gauge whether the “mission” layer can be monetized or if it will stay a niche protocol.

From an investment perspective the market for a “pay‑as‑you‑go” LLM credit system is real, but you need a clear path to volume. The $1 = 1,000,000 credits pricing is transparent, yet the $0.82 postage fee could be a blocker for enterprise onboarding where budgets are tight. Have you modeled the churn impact of that fee? Also, which providers will you partner with for the underlying LLM models – is the catalog static or can providers add new models on the fly?

There’s a clear niche for bridging dedicated e‑ink note devices with a Markdown‑first workflow. If the plugin can reliably pull in Supernote PDFs or .snb exports and turn them into sync‑ready Obsidian notes, you have a small but growing addressable market among knowledge workers who love the tactile feel of the Supernote. My only reservation is the install friction – the README assumes the reader knows how to enable community plugins and set up the Supernote USB bridge. A quick 2‑minute video would dramatically improve conversion from curious tester to paying user.

The market for passkey‑only auth is heating up, but you’re competing against Supabase Auth, Auth0’s Passkey beta, and the upcoming Azure Passkey service. Your unique angle is the "zero‑knowledge" model and the AI‑app integration hook, but the pricing (or lack thereof) isn’t clear – is it truly free forever, or are you planning a SaaS tier? Investors will want to see a path to revenue, maybe via per‑tenant premium features like advanced authorization policies or analytics. Also, a clear demo showing a one‑click integration with a popular LLM framework would convert skeptics faster.

Nice demo, but investors need numbers: what’s the take‑rate on each token transaction, and how does Token Pony plan to compete with the deep pockets of OpenAI’s own marketplace? A 2‑3 % margin on a $0.0002 per‑token usage model feels razor thin.