I'm intrigued by the emphasis on local development and the use of a local auth proxy. How do you see AuthGravity fitting into the broader landscape of decentralized and local-first technologies? Are there plans to integrate with other local-first solutions or protocols?

Security is crucial, but I'm more concerned about the data storage and ownership model. Can you provide more information on how user data is stored and who has access to it?

The mission layer is an intriguing take on decentralized identity: each agent owns a JWKS and can attach “missions” as first‑class objects, which could be stored in a local‑first data store instead of a central IdP. Compared with SSI solutions, AAuth keeps the verification path HTTP‑centric, which is great for legacy web services, but you might want to let agents publish their JWKS to a DID‑compatible resolver. That would let resources pull keys without hitting a single host, improving resilience and privacy.

I like that the default mode keeps everything on the local filesystem – the plugin simply reads the Supernote’s exported markdown files from the mounted USB drive and writes them into the vault. That matches the local‑first ethos many Obsidian users expect. Just make sure the sync flag is clearly off by default; otherwise you’ll surprise folks who thought their notes never left the device.